Family Firms as Context for Organizational Behavior Processes

Éditeurs invités

  • Melanie De Ruiter, Nyenrode Business University
  • Benjamin D. McLarty, Louisiana Tech University
  • Denise M. Rousseau, Carnegie Mellon University
  • James M. Vardaman, Memphis University

Synthèse

Despite calls to consider context in Organizational Behavior (OB) and management research, the broader OB and management literature has largely ignored family firms and the experiences and employment dynamics of their employees. OB research samples often are drawn without considering the nature of the settings involved or any potential impact on the variables of interest. Since family firms are a common type of business, ranging from sixty-five to ninety percent worldwide, samples in many OB and management studies likely conflate respondents from family and non-family firms. Such conflation can mask differences in behavioral processes that can result in erroneous inferences.

Treatment of family/non-family business as a dichotomous moderator only allows general differences to be noted without theoretically comparing psychological processes at the individual, team, and organizational levels. Moreover, since there is considerable heterogeneity within family firms, grouping employees working in different family firms together will likely forego important across family firm contextual differences in OB processes. Most studies in family firm research have been described as 'context-less'.

Extrait. Lire l'appel complet sur le site de l'éditeur.

Thèmes proposés

  • Development and validation of measurement instruments (including assessment of measurement invariance) that allow a more generic assessment of contextual effects often put forward in family firm research (e.g., socioemotional wealth) to help theorize and understand similarities and differences in OB processes between family and non-family firms, and within family firms
  • Explicit tests of theories of context (e.g., trait activation theory; situation strength theory) to explain differences in relationships between personality traits and employee outcomes between family and non-family firms and within different types of family firms (e.g., enhanced understanding of family firm context as a driver for personality activation and impact on workplace performance and behaviors)
  • Development and validation of personality measurement instruments specific to the context of family for use in family firms, and meaningful contextual comparisons across family firms (including assessment of measurement invariance)
  • Enhanced theoretical understanding of how bifurcation bias based on family firm context as a potential motivational force for driving employee attitudes and behaviors
  • Multilevel research to better understand how the family firm context affects the extent to which leadership styles may (or may not) trickle down from family executives to family and non-family managers and in turn affect non-family employee outcomes in different types of family firms
  • An exploration of how critical events within the family firm context and family/non-family member dynamics shape employee and non-family manager perceptions and evaluations of their employment relationship with the family firm