<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel>
        <title>kerostig | Tag : stakeholder dynamics</title>
        <link>https://kerostig.org/tag/stakeholder-dynamics/</link>
        <description>Derniers appels à publications avec le tag 'stakeholder dynamics'.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 08:33:59 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator>
        <language>fr</language>
        
        <copyright>Notices : kerostig © 2026. Le texte des appels appartient à leurs éditeurs.</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Responsibility Contested: Tensions and Dynamics in Responsible Innovation]]></title>
            <link>https://kerostig.org/call/wiley-responsibility-contested-tensions-and-dynamics-in-responsible-innovation/</link>
            <guid>wiley-responsibility-contested-tensions-and-dynamics-in-responsible-innovation</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 11:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div>
    
        
        <p><strong>Claudia Buengeler</strong>, Kiel University</p>
        
        <p><strong>Stefan Hoffmann</strong>, Kiel University</p>
        
        <p><strong>Kristina Nickel</strong>, Kiel University</p>
        
        <p><strong>Carsten Schultz</strong>, Kiel University</p>
        
        <p><strong>Achim Walter</strong>, Kiel University</p>
        
    
    
    
    <p>Responsible Innovation has emerged as a key framework for aligning innovation with ethical and societal values. However, RI initiatives often encounter backlash rooted in tensions between innovation and regulation, economic incentives and ethics, and efficiency versus long-term responsibility. Recent examples include tech companies discontinuing AI ethics programs and policy shifts away from responsible AI language.</p>
    
    <p>Backlash against RI is distinct from general resistance to innovation, as it seeks to restore previous states. Operating at individual, organizational, and societal levels, it is driven by concerns about identity threats, values, and power structures. While often viewed negatively, some backlash may carry constructive implications by prompting rebalancing of innovation priorities.</p>
    
    <p>
        Appel publié par Journal of Product Innovation Management.
        
        <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/pb-assets/assets/15405885/cfp/JPIM_Updated_CfP_Backlash_RI-1791199971140.pdf">Lire l'appel complet sur le site de l'éditeur</a>.
        
        <a href="https://kerostig.org/call/wiley-responsibility-contested-tensions-and-dynamics-in-responsible-innovation/">Fiche de l'appel sur kerostig</a>.
    </p>
    
    <h2>Potential topics</h2>
    <ul>
        
        <li>Backlash against responsible innovation</li>
        
        <li>Tensions in responsible innovation implementation</li>
        
        <li>Conceptualizing backlash across disciplines</li>
        
        <li>Individual, social, and organizational drivers of backlash</li>
        
        <li>Dynamics of backlash in organizations</li>
        
        <li>Consequences of backlash on innovation adoption</li>
        
        <li>Countermeasures and resilience strategies</li>
        
        <li>Identity and values in innovation resistance</li>
        
        <li>Multi-level backlash phenomena</li>
        
        <li>Responsible innovation in healthcare, IT, energy, mobility, and food sectors</li>
        
    </ul>
    
    
    <h2>Timeline</h2>
    <ul>
        
        <li>March 1, 2026: Submission of extended abstracts for PDW</li>
        
        <li>April 1, 2026: Feedback to authors based on extended abstracts</li>
        
        <li>February 1, 2027: Full paper submission window opens</li>
        
        <li>February 28, 2027: Full paper submission deadline</li>
        
        <li>May 1, 2027: Feedback to authors on full papers</li>
        
        <li>September 1, 2027: Submission of revised papers</li>
        
        <li>January 1, 2028: Feedback to authors on revised papers</li>
        
        <li>March 1, 2028: Submission of revised papers</li>
        
        <li>April 1, 2028: Final decision</li>
        
    </ul>
    
    
    <h2>Associate editors</h2>
    <ul>
        
        <li><strong>Minu Kumar</strong>, San Francisco State University</li>
        
    </ul>
    
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>